Spinal cord stimulator · St. Louis

You get to try it before you commit to it. Almost nothing else in this field works that way.

Spinal cord stimulation uses thin leads in the epidural space (the space around the spinal cord). They send low-level electrical signals to the dorsal columns (nerve pathways at the back of the cord). That changes how pain signals are processed on the way up. It is implanted hardware. It is also the only major treatment here with a true trial period built into the pathway, so nobody is asked to guess.

A medical device with digital displays and leads, seen close up.

How does a spinal cord stimulator work?

Thin leads are placed in the epidural space. They deliver low-level electrical signals to the dorsal columns. The effect is on transmission, not on structure. It changes how pain signals are processed on the way up. It does not repair anything below.

That makes it a poor fit for a fixable mechanical problem. It is a reasonable fit for pain that persists after the mechanical problem has been addressed, or where no correctable lesion exists. Newer waveforms do not depend on producing tingling in place of pain. That tingling was the main complaint about older systems.

Who is a candidate for a spinal cord stimulator?

  • Persistent pain after spine surgery, especially with a significant leg component. This is the most established indication (reason to use it). Pain after back surgery.
  • Complex regional pain syndrome.
  • Painful diabetic neuropathy, where the evidence has grown considerably stronger.
  • Radicular pain (nerve root pain) that surgery cannot correct. It has failed reasonable conservative and interventional care.

It is not a treatment for an untested facet joint, an unexamined sacroiliac joint, or a back that has never had a diagnostic workup. Reaching for hardware before a block is the sequence error this whole practice exists to avoid.

How does a spinal cord stimulator trial work?

  1. Temporary leads are placed percutaneously (through the skin). You wear the generator outside the body.
  2. You live with it for several days. You are at home, living your actual life, not lying in a clinic.
  3. You keep a record of pain and, more importantly, of function: what you did that you could not do before.
  4. Meaningful improvement means proceed. Anything less means the leads come out, and nothing was permanently changed.

Judge the trial on function, not on a pain score. Did you sleep, walk further, or get through a shift? That is the outcome that predicts satisfaction with a permanent implant. A number out of ten does not.

What are the downsides of a spinal cord stimulator?

This is implanted hardware in a body. Lead migration (the leads shifting) happens and sometimes needs revision. Infection risk is low but not zero. It matters more with an implant than with an injection. Batteries need charging or eventual replacement. MRI compatibility varies by system. It must be established before the implant, not discovered later.

Effectiveness can also decline over time in some patients. That is a real effect. It belongs in the conversation before the decision, not after it.

Where the terrain comes in again

Say your body runs a high inflammatory tone and poorly controlled glucose. Then an implant carries a higher infection risk and heals its pocket less well. Improving that before the implant is not an obstacle put in your way. It is the part that makes the procedure safer, and it is worth doing properly.

Frequently asked questions

Will I feel it?

With newer waveforms, usually not. Older paresthesia-based systems swapped a tingling sensation for the pain. Some people liked that and others did not.

Is it reversible?

The system can be removed. The trial phase is fully reversible by design. That is what makes the pathway unusual and reasonable.

Does insurance cover it?

Commonly, for established indications and after documented failure of conservative care. Approval is permission to proceed, not a promise of payment. You will be told where you stand before anything is scheduled.

Does a spinal cord stimulator fix what is causing my back pain?

No. It works on transmission, not structure. The leads change how pain signals are processed on the way up to the brain. But they do not repair anything below. That is why it is a poor fit for a fixable mechanical problem. It is a reasonable fit for pain that persists after that problem has been addressed, or where no correctable lesion exists.

How do I know if the stimulator trial worked?

Judge it on function, not on a pain score. You live with the temporary leads for several days. During that time, keep a record of what you did that you could not do before. Did you sleep, walk further or get through a shift? Meaningful improvement in function means proceed. Anything less means the leads come out, and nothing was permanently changed.

Can you have an MRI with a spinal cord stimulator?

It depends on the system. MRI compatibility varies from one stimulator system to another. So it has to be established before the implant, not discovered later. If you expect to need MRI scans in the future, raise that when the system is being chosen. Do not wait until it is already in place.

Can a spinal cord stimulator stop working over time?

Yes, in some patients. Effectiveness can decline over time. That is a real effect, so it is discussed before the decision, not after it. Other practical issues come with any implant. Leads can migrate and sometimes need revision. Batteries need charging or eventual replacement. The trial tells you whether it helps. This tells you what living with it involves.

Related reading

The trial answers the question that guessing cannot

If you have exhausted the reasonable options and the pain has a large leg component, this is a conversation worth having properly.

12174 Natural Bridge Rd, Suite 301
St. Louis, MO 63044
At DePaul Hospital on Natural Bridge Road, inside the I-270 and I-70 interchange, on the west side of the airport.

Sources

  • Kallewaard JW et al. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Nonsurgical Refractory Back Pain With or Without Leg Pain (Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 1). Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society, 2026. PubMed 41313285
  • ElSaban M et al. Physical functioning following spinal cord stimulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2023. PubMed 37080578
  • Grider JS et al. Effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Spinal Pain: A Systematic Review. Pain physician, 2016. PubMed 26752493
  • Taylor RS et al. Predictors of pain relief following spinal cord stimulation in chronic back and leg pain and failed back surgery syndrome: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain, 2014. PubMed 23834386